Dryden's essay on Dramatic poesy:

Dryden's essay on Dramatic poesy:

This task is given by Dilip sir. The bridge course: Dryden's essay on Dramatic poesy. I wrote this blog by watching video about this topic.

➡️ Discuss any differences you observe           between Aristotle's definition of                   Tragedy and Dryden's definition ofplay 

        ✴️Aristotle's definition of tragedy and dryden's definition of play have some key differences:

🔷Aristotle's definition of tragedy:

 🔹 Aristotle defined tragedy as a form of drama that portrays the downfall of a noble character due to a tragic flow, leading to a catharsis of emotions in the audience.

🔹 Tragedy, according to Aristotle, involves a serious and complex plot that evokes feelings of pity and fear in the audience.

🔹 Aristotle emphasized the importance of unity of action, time and place in tragedy,to create a cohesleve and impactful dramatic experience.

🔷 Dryden's definition of play:

🔹 Dryden's definition of play is border and less specific than Aristotle definition of Tragedy.

🔹 Dryden viewed plays as work of drama that encompass various genres, including comedy,tragedy and tragicomedy among others.

🔹 Unlike Aristotle's focus on the tragic hero and catharsis, Dryden's definition of play encompasses a winder range of dramatic forms and styles, reflecting the diversity of theatrical expression.

➡️ If you were to express your personal preference, would you side with the Ancients or the Moderns? Provide reasons for your choice.

           

            I would side with the Moderns. While the Ancients laid the foundation for many literary and philosophical concepts, I appreciate the innovative and progressive nature of the Moderns. The Moderns have pushed boundaries, challenged traditional norms, and explored new ideas, leading to diverse and dynamic forms of expression in literature, art, and philosophy. Their willingness to experiment, adapt, and evolve resonates with my inclination towards embracing change, creativity, and individuality.

➡️Evaluate whether the arguments presented in favor of French plays and against English plays are appropriate. For example, consider the portrayal of death, duel fights with blunted swords, the representation of large armies by a few actors, the mingling of mirth and serious tones, and the use of multiple plots.

The arguments in favor of French plays and against English plays regarding the portrayal of death, duel fights with blunted swords, representation of large armies by a few actors, mingling of mirth and serious tones, and the use of multiple plots can be evaluated based on their appropriateness in the context of dramatic representation.

French plays often emphasize a more refined and stylized approach to portraying death, utilizing symbolic gestures and poetic language to convey the gravity of such moments. In contrast, English plays may opt for a more direct and realistic depiction of death, aiming to evoke a visceral reaction from the audience. Both approaches have their merits, with French plays focusing on the emotional and intellectual aspects of death, while English plays aim for a raw and immediate impact.

The representation of large armies by a few actors in French plays can be seen as a creative and efficient way to convey the scale of battles while focusing on individual characters' experiences and emotions. In contrast, English plays may opt for a more realistic portrayal of battles with a larger cast, aiming to create a sense of chaos and spectacle on stage. Both methods have their strengths in evoking the grandeur and intensity of warfare within the dramatic context.

The mingling of mirth and serious tones in French plays allows for a nuanced exploration of human emotions and experiences, blending humor with poignant moments to create a rich and multifaceted narrative. English plays may also incorporate a mix of tones to engage the audience and provide a diverse range of emotional experiences. Both approaches can be effective in capturing the complexities and contradictions of human nature within the dramatic framework.

   English plays may opt for a more straightforward and linear narrative structure, focusing on the development of central characters and conflicts. Both approaches have their advantages in creating depth and complexity within the dramatic framework, catering to different storytelling preferences and audience expectations.

➡️ State your preference for poetic or prosaic dialogues in a play and explain your reasoning.

          I would lean towards poetic dialogues in a play. Poetic language has a unique ability to evoke emotions, create vivid imagery, and enhance the overall aesthetic and artistic quality of the dialogue. Poetic dialogues can elevate the language of the play, adding depth, beauty, and a lyrical quality that can captivate the audience and immerse them in the world of the story. The richness of language and the artistry of poetry can bring a sense of enchatment and magic to the theatrical experience, making it more memorable and engaging for both the performance and the audience.

Wordsworth's preface:

Wordsworth's preface:

   

     This task is given by Dilip sir, the bridge course Wordsworth preface and his point of view of poet and poetry. I watch video lectures related to Wordsworth and then wrote this blog by the given topics.

✴️ Wordsworth's preface:

       William Wordsworth (1770-1850)

     

➡️ Analyze the poem in the context of Wordsworth's poetic creed.

        In analyzing a poem in the context of Wordsworth's poetic creed, we would focus on his belief in the power of nature, the importance of individual experience and emotion, and the connection between the natural world and human emotions. Wordsworth valued simplicity, spontaneity, and sincerity in poetry, aiming to capture moments of emotional intensity and spiritual insight.

When examining a poem through Wordsworth's lens, we would look for elements such as the poet's personal response to nature, the expression of deep emotions, and the presence of vivid imagery that connects human experiences to the natural world. Wordsworth believed that poetry should reflect the inner workings of the human mind and the beauty of the natural world.

By applying Wordsworth's poetic creed to a poem, we can explore how the poet conveys their emotions, experiences, and reflections through a connection with nature, creating a profound and authentic poetic expression that resonates with the reader's emotions and experiences.

➡️ Wordsworth states, “A language was           thus insensibly produced, differing             materially from the real language of            men in any situation.” Explain and                illustrate this with reference to your            reading of Wordsworth’s views on                poetic diction in the .

                 Wordsworth's statement, "A language was thus insensibly produced, differing materially from the real language of men in any situation," refers to his belief that poetry should use a language that is distinct from everyday speech. He advocated for a poetic diction that is more elevated, imaginative, and emotionally charged than ordinary language. Wordsworth aimed to create a poetic language that captures the essence of human emotions and experiences in a heightened and profound way.

In his views on poetic diction, Wordsworth emphasized the importance of simplicity, sincerity, and authenticity in poetry. He believed that poets should use language that is closer to natural speech, avoiding artificial and overly ornate expressions. Wordsworth valued the use of common language to convey deep emotions and truths, making poetry more accessible and relatable to readers.

By employing a language that differs from everyday speech, Wordsworth sought to elevate the emotional and imaginative power of poetry, creating a unique form of expression that resonates with the universal experiences of humanity. Through this distinct poetic language, Wordsworth aimed to capture the essence of human emotions and experiences in a way that transcends ordinary communication and connects deeply with the reader's innermost feelings.

➡️ Wordsworth describes a poet as "a              man speaking to men: a man, it is               endowed with more lively sensibility,           more enthusiasm and tenderness.”             Explain this with reference to your               reading of Wordsworth’s views in the .

              Wordsworth sees a poet as someone who speaks to people with heightened sensitivity, passion, and empathy. He believes that poets possess a deeper emotional awareness and a profound connection to the world around them, allowing them to express human experiences in a more vivid and touching manner. By being more attuned to their emotions and surroundings, poets can convey universal truths and feelings that resonate with readers on a profound level. This heightened sensibility and tenderness enable poets to communicate the beauty, complexities, and nuances of life in a way that touches the hearts and minds of their audience.