➡️ Flipped Learning: Digital Humanities
🔷 What is Digital Humanities? What’s it doing in English Department?
Digital Humanities (DH) is an interdisciplinary field that brings together traditional humanistic inquiry with digital tools, technologies, and methods. It uses computational approaches such as text mining, data visualization, digital archiving, mapping, and multimedia analysis to study literature, history, philosophy, linguistics, and culture.
Why in the English Department?
Traditionally, English studies focused on close reading of literary texts, interpretation, and critical analysis. Digital Humanities extends this by introducing new methodologies:
Text Analysis: Using algorithms to trace themes, word frequencies, and stylistic patterns in novels, poems, and plays.
Digital Archives: Preserving rare manuscripts, letters, and historical documents online for global access.
Visualization & Mapping: Creating maps of literary journeys, timelines of authors, or networks of characters.
Multimodal Scholarship: Engaging with literature through podcasts, interactive websites, or digital storytelling.
Pedagogical Tools: Enabling students to learn through digital editions, online annotation tools, and collaborative projects.
In the English Department, DH is not replacing traditional literary study but enriching it. It allows scholars to bridge close reading (detailed interpretation of passages) with distant reading (big data analysis of thousands of texts), creating a fuller understanding of literature and culture.
Thus, DH transforms the English Department into a space where literature, history, and culture meet technology, fostering innovation, collaboration, and accessibility.
🔷 Why / How Digital Humanities Appears (or Belongs) in English Departments :
💠 Intellectual and Scholarly Advantages
💠 Working at Scale – “Distant Reading”
Digital Humanities (DH) makes it possible to study literature on a much larger scale. Instead of focusing on a single novel or poem, researchers can detect themes, word patterns, or citation networks across vast collections of texts. This method doesn’t replace close reading but extends it with broader insights.
💠 Fresh Interpretive Tools and Visual Methods
Through mapping, data visualization, or computational modeling, DH reveals connections and movements in texts that traditional reading may overlook. For example, mapping journeys in novels or tracking stylistic changes across decades opens up new interpretive possibilities.
💠 Access, Preservation, and Public Sharing
Digitized archives, interactive editions, and open-access projects make rare or fragile works widely available. English departments, particularly those with valuable manuscript or rare book holdings, can use DH approaches to safeguard and share their collections with broader audiences.
💠 Critical Engagement with Media
DH also encourages reflection on how technologies from print to digital platforms shape meaning. It positions the digital not only as a tool for research but also as a medium worthy of critique and study.
💠 Cross-Disciplinary Partnerships
The field thrives on collaboration: literary scholars work alongside computer scientists, librarians, linguists, and media experts. English studies can thus become central to interdisciplinary networks.
🔷 Challenges and Points of Caution
💠 Skills Gap
Most humanities researchers are not trained in coding, database management, or data analysis. Successful DH projects often require either additional learning or collaboration with technical experts.
💠 Risk of Over-Quantification
Turning texts into datasets runs the risk of flattening meaning into numbers. Some critics fear this may downplay the richness of interpretation that close reading offers.
💠 Funding and Infrastructure Needs
Digital projects require money, time, technical infrastructure, and long-term upkeep. Without proper support, they can quickly fade.
💠 Obsolescence and Fragility
Digital tools, platforms, and file formats can become outdated. A project may become unusable if it isn’t actively maintained.
💠 Bias and Unequal Representation
Not all texts get digitized, which can skew research. Digitization often reflects certain cultural, institutional, or linguistic priorities, creating blind spots.
💠 Theoretical Gaps
Some DH projects risk treating digitization as a neutral process, ignoring the cultural, social, or political implications embedded in technology itself.
🔷 What Is the “Introduction to Digital Humanities” Course (Harvard / edX)
🔹 What Is the Course?
Title / Platform: Introduction to Digital Humanities, offered by Harvard University via edX.
Instructor: Peter K. Bol (Charles H. Carswell Professor of East Asian Languages & Civilizations)
Pace / Duration: ~7 weeks, with an expected effort of 2–4 hours per week.
🔹 Cost / Access:
• You can audit (take parts of the course for free).
• If you want a verified certificate, there is a fee (for example, USD 219 in recent offerings).
🔷 What You Will Learn / Course Content
The course is designed for learners from humanities, library/archives, cultural institutions, or anyone curious about applying digital tools to humanistic research.
🔹 Here are the main modules / topics and learning outcomes:
Module / Topic Key Skills or Concepts
Digital Humanities & Data What “digital humanities” means across disciplines; thinking about data, classification systems, hierarchies, what counts as data.
Digital Humanities Projects & Tools Survey of digital tools (for text, spatial work, networks, images), and how DH tools are applied in literature, history, art, music.
Acquiring, Cleaning, and Creating Data Understanding unstructured / semi-structured / structured data; file types; issues of licensing & rights; techniques for preparing data.
Command Line Basics How to use command-line tools to manipulate text files, filter, combine, extract data.
Working with Voyant (Visualization Tool) Using Voyant (a text analysis / visualization environment) to create, compare, explore textual datasets.
🔹 By the end of the course, learners should be able to:
Understand core tools and methods in DH (text analysis, visualization)
Handle different data formats, clean and prepare data for analysis
Use command-line operations on text
Create visual/textual analyses (e.g. via Voyant)
Strengths, Intended Audience & Uses
Beginner-friendly: No heavy prerequisites; suitable for those new to digital humanities or with limited technical background.
Hands-on with real tools: Rather than purely theoretical, it introduces you to actual software (Voyant) and command-line work.
Digital scholarship foundation: It gives you foundational skills to take up more advanced DH or digital projects (e.g. text mining, spatial analysis) later.
Flexible / self-paced: You can go through materials at your own speed, especially in auditing mode.
🔷 Why This Course Matters / What It Illustrates About Digital Humanities
🌐 Why This Course Matters
🔹 Gateway to Digital Humanities
The course serves as an accessible entry point for those in the humanities who may not have prior experience with coding, data analysis, or digital tools. It lowers the barrier of entry and helps humanists step into a digitally mediated research world.
🔹 Bridging Theory and Practice
Instead of remaining purely conceptual, the course integrates both what DH is and how it works introducing learners to visualization, text mining, and command-line basics while also keeping critical reflection in focus.
🔹 Relevance for Today’s Humanities
Humanities disciplines are increasingly shaped by digital archives, online publishing, and computational tools. This course highlights that DH is no longer peripheral but central to research, teaching, and cultural preservation.
🔹 Professional and Academic Value
By teaching transferable digital skills—data cleaning, visualization, text analysis—it makes participants more adaptable for careers in research, libraries, publishing, and digital archives. It also strengthens the academic profile of humanities scholars who wish to integrate digital tools into their work.
💠 What It Illustrates About Digital Humanities
🔸 DH is about Scale and Methods
The course emphasizes that DH is not about abandoning close reading but about enhancing it with “distant reading,” visualization, and pattern detection—showing DH as both complementary and transformative.
🔸 DH is Hands-On and Tool-Based
By teaching Voyant and command-line basics, it demonstrates that DH is as much about practice as about theory. It’s not only discussing texts but also doing things with texts.
🔸 DH Encourages Interdisciplinarity
The course models the collaboration of humanities with computer science, data analysis, and information science—illustrating how English, history, and cultural studies intersect with technology.
🔸 DH Reflects on Media and Technology
The course reminds learners that digitization, formats, and platforms are not neutral—they shape how knowledge is preserved, accessed, and interpreted. In this sense, DH is both a method and a critique of the digital world itself.
🔸 DH is Public-Facing
By showing how archives and digital projects expand access, the course reinforces DH’s mission of making humanities knowledge more widely available, beyond the academy.
✨ In short:
The course matters because it shows how digital tools and methods expand the horizons of humanistic study while also raising new questions about media, access, and interpretation.
🔷 “Why Are We So Scared of Robots / AI?” The Short Films & Their Role
🔻 Why Are We So Scared of Robots / AI?
1. Loss of Control
– Fear that machines may surpass human intelligence and act independently of our intentions.
– Popular narratives imagine robots turning against their creators.
2. Replacement Anxiety
– Worry that AI/robots will take over human jobs, skills, or even emotional roles.
– Reflects broader social fears about irrelevance in a mechanized world.
3. Uncanny Valley Effect
– When robots appear almost human but not quite, it creates unease.
– This psychological discomfort fuels suspicion and fear.
4. Ethical / Moral Concerns
– Anxiety about programming values into AI: whose ethics will they follow?
– Raises questions of responsibility if AI causes harm.
5. Cultural & Historical Myths
– From Frankenstein to Terminator, Western culture has long imagined technology “going rogue.”
– These myths shape present fears as much as real technology does.
🎬 The Role of Short Films
🔸 Visualization of Fear
– Short films condense big anxieties into powerful imagery: killer machines, hyper-efficient systems, or robots with eerie human traits.
🔸 Speculative Testing Grounds
– Filmmakers use shorts to “play out” scenarios: What if machines gained feelings? What if they turned violent? What if they were better than us at everything?
🔸 Accessible Public Debate
– Unlike academic essays, short films reach wider audiences. They spark discussion by dramatizing abstract issues like control, ethics, or identity.
🔸 Allegories of the Present
– Often, the robots in films stand in for present fears corporate power, surveillance, dehumanization, inequality making the technology a mirror for society.
🔷 These films tend to depict AI in ways that trigger fear or moral caution:
🎥 How Short Films Depict AI to Trigger Fear or Moral Caution
🔹Obsession or loss of control (Ghost Machine)
🔹Domestic uncanny / boundary trouble (The iMom)
🔹Blurred lines of human/robot identity (Anukul)
They act as canon of cautionary AI narratives. Watching them helps students see the patterns: what kinds of fears, metaphors, moral dilemmas are commonly represented.
From that vantage, the pedagogical task is to acknowledge those narratives but then to reimagine alternatives: to ask, What if AI is not just threat but enabler? What new conflicts, new moral questions, new modes of partnership might we explore?
Thus, the films are not purely entertainment; they’re critical tools: material to analyze, deconstruct, and then to repurpose or invert in creative exercise.
🔷 Reflections & Suggestions (for Your Article / Analysis)
1. Narrative Power & AI Myths
The way we tell stories about AI (robots as monsters, rebellions, betrayal) shapes public imagination, policy, ethics. Barad’s exercise is valuable because it asks: how much of AI fear is built from narrative tropes, not from realities?
2. Co-creation with Generative AI
The article encourages using generative AI as a brainstorming or scaffolding tool. This raises interesting questions: when AI helps generate narrative, is the human still fully author? How to maintain critical distance? It’s a good intersection of DH (tool + critique).
3. Limits of Optimism
Reimagining positive AI narratives is important, but it must be tempered with realism: issues of bias, power, data inequities, surveillance, large-scale control. Good narratives will have friction, tension, ethical complexity.
4. Media / Multimodal Narratives
The exercise, by pointing to short films and encouraging hypertexts/blogs, suggests that DH storytelling is multimodal: not just linear prose, but visual + interactive + hybrid media. This reflects how the digital medium changes narrative form.
5. Cultural & Local Specificity
The films chosen are from different cultural contexts (e.g. Anukul from Indian literary tradition). That helps students see how AI narratives are not monolithic different societies privilege different metaphors or fears. You could reflect on how local / Indian cultural imaginaries of AI differ from Western ones.
6. Ethics, Power, Embeddedness
Reimagined narratives should still contend with embedded social realities: who controls AI, who profits, who is surveilled, who is marginalized. A story of benevolent AI is not enough if it hides power asymmetry.
💠 Refrences:
https://sites.google.com/view/maengmkbu2020/sem-3/crit-2
https://blog.dilipbarad.com/2019/03/why-are-we-so-scared-of-robots-ais.html
Thank you.
Be learners !!
No comments:
Post a Comment